The Rolling Blackout

This is great! From September 17th, 2009.

Smith has some good comments on revolution, and definitely disagrees on some of the arguments made in Multitude and Commonwealth.   Super interestingly though, Smith discusses the resolution of Foucault and Marx, claiming (as a I agree) they should not be pitted towards one another as has often been done. The discussions of revolution are important in both, and surely Foucault critiques Marxist thought, but he points to the necessity of “lots of work” to initiate substantive changes.  That is, the politics of the common, will not be developed spontaneously (especially if built on ethics/politics as individual decisions, ethics/politics must be collective), revolution will not come easily and surely not spontaneously! Political action is willed action, with thought. Alternative institutions and organization are necessary.  Hardt discusses that they are not “for spontaneity”, but that organizational efforts begin in revolt or in…

View original post 71 more words

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s