Lazzarato — The Making of the Indebted Man

Coming off of reading Nomad Citizenship last quarter, and thinking about Lazzarato’s writing on immaterial labor this summer, I was fortunate enough this afternoon to come across a guy reading this:

Image

Based on the publisher’s description, it seems like it would fit in really well with Holland’s ideas about minor marxism — specifically its three dependencies: work, consumption, and debt, all of which I mention here and here.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Lazzarato — The Making of the Indebted Man

  1. Definitely! Something interesting, Lazzarato claims to be anti-Marxist. This comes out most strongly in RĂ©volutions du Capitalisme. Yet, when one looks closely, it appears that they’re so incredibly marxist that he’s either quibbling with the French and Italian academic-political scene, or he’s trying be to explicitly post-Marxist.

    Lazzarato’s a bit uninventive when it comes to actually-existing political examples (for instance the federated “coordinations” that were meant to replace unions as syndicalist action groups), but his theory is extensive, top-notch, and updates a lot of Deleuze’s more philosophical references.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s